immediate expression.
With regard to works in all the branches of the fine arts, I may remark
that the pleasure arising from novelty must of course be allowed its due
place and weight. This pleasure consists in the identity of two opposite
elements - that is to say, sameness and variety. If in the midst of the
variety there be not some fixed object for the attention, the unceasing
succession of the variety will prevent the mind from observing the
difference of the individual objects; and the only thing remaining will
be the succession, which will then produce precisely the same effect as
sameness. This we experience when we let the trees or hedges pass
before the fixed eye during a rapid movement in a carriage, or, on the
other hand, when we suffer a file of soldiers or ranks of men in
procession to go on before us without resting the eye on anyone in
particular. In order to derive pleasure from the occupation of the mind,
the principle of unity must always be present, so that in the midst of the
multeity the cetripetal force be never suspended, nor the sense be
fatigued by the predominance of the centrifugal force. This unity in
multeity I have elsewhere stated as the principle of beauty. It is equally
the source of pleasure in variety, and in fact a higher term including
both. What is the seclusive or distinguishing term between them?
Remember that there is a difference between form as proceeding, and
shape as superinduced; - the latter is either the death or the
imprisonment of the thing; - the former is its self-witnessing and self-
effected sphere of agency. Art would or should be the abridgment of
nature. Now the fullness of nature is without character, as water is
purest when without taste, smell, or color; but this is the highest, the
apex only - it is not the whole. The object of art is to give the whole
ad
hominem;
hence each step of nature hath its ideal, and hence the
possibility of a climax up to the perfect form of a harmonized chaos.
To the idea of life victory or strife is necessary; as virtue consists not
simply in the absence of vices, but in the overcoming of them. So it is
in beauty. The sight of what is subordinated and conquered heightens
 |
9 |
 |
|